One
Dot
A Life full of mistakes...
in scientia veritas, in artes honestas...
It would not be very wrong or outrageous to say that one could treat illness with music, paint a canvas with sulphur and cadmium, write poetry for proving a mathematical theorem and take a photograph with the blink of an eye. Indeed, music IS therapeutic enough to alleviate depression, paint IS made up of chemical substances, poetry comprises of metric rhythms and mathematical progressions, and memories are photographic images of past incidents stored in the brain. Yet, as Einstein quite rightly points out, gravitation is not responsible for people falling in love. Also, imagination is more important than knowledge. New discoveries and inventions would have been impossible without creativity and imagination.
Hence, in my mind, the scales don’t really balance when it comes to science or arts. It’s a never-ending base-superstructure (base being science and superstructure being arts) dialectical leitmotif for me. But however often this recurring imbalance haunts me, I always knew that one reciprocates the other and that there has to be a structure that houses both the disciplines. The boundary seems to get blurred in a post-structural fashion, as if by deconstruction, and the field of Anthropology wins all the votes. But one must look hard for something, sometimes consciously and sometimes even the world conspires and gets it for you when you are temporarily not looking. The moment of arriving at a juncture where a balance is struck is almost like death, which is only the beginning. One gets flashes of the past in a series of linked montages at such arrival points and it makes all the more sense, just like in the Nonsense of Sukumar Ray or in the secret anagrams of Leonardo Da Vinci.
Just like Alice, I would like to keep myself busy in all things human. I would rather indulge myself in social questions and finding scientific answers so that our planet doesn’t get run over by intergalactic bypasses and leave the residual hitchhiking survivors like Douglas Adams’s character Arthur Dent, cursed to forever brood over the planet that was really never meant to be obviously because of the insensible viscous acts of human civilization.
We have done more damage to our planet than the rodents that destroy our crops. If in science lies the truth and the key to technological advances, in art lies the honour in keeping and maintaining such advances. Human beings fight among themselves and in doing so create havoc and leave a long trail of wreckage endangering life on Earth and nature itself. If we don’t act responsible socially and resolve social problems within our communities then the relationship between human and nature will worsen. We get angry at each other and greet each other with atom bombs. But what could we do when the Tsunami washed away several lives, and stripped off the nuclear plants naked? When nature strikes back, we will all be mashed into a coagulation of useless dump that might resemble some 20th Century Dada art but it needs serious recycling with another Big Bang. It wouldn’t even be funny!
.jpg)
(painting courtesy: Ruben Monakhov http://rubenm.spb.ru/)
Image Courtesy: Santhosh Pai aka SanpaiyaIs it art when men lie and compartmentalise their conscience???
Then it's definitely art to march into the unknown...cos' the unknown can't offer worse than the known...
Truth always brings happiness...in this day and age where nothing costs or hurts more than truth, I embrace truth...for it shall always remain with me and my people around me...
Amen...
.jpg)
By the busy lane, there is an address. Lives the hearty one. My tooth hurts, but it ain't a sweet one...(I am selling myself to myself...eh!) Have you heard Joni Mitchell lately? Just crossed my mind...so where were we? Bloody address. Bloody identity crisis! Last night i slept in sweat, my fan is filled with filth. But am buying lights, lots of them...spotlines and clear ones, all sorts...even twinkle lights...will they heat up my address? But thats not sufficient. For what isn't sufficient is inevitable. I am preparing for an exam that never frightens, which probably doesn't even exist in this huge blob of a Universe...
If we could think of films as paintings of different styles and forms, be it history painting, landscape or portrait painting, we would be able to solve only some of the problems of defining “film genre”. It is important to identify genre as a problem, and interpreting it, more so, at least from a film critic’s point of view. In Chapter 8 of his book “Image and Mind” (1995), Gregory Currie speaks extensively of the ‘interpretive problem’. He explores the ways in which film narrative and literary narrative differ. Others such as Noël Carroll and Richard Allen have theorized the nature of moving images in great lengths. Grodal presents models for interpreting film genre by transcending to a psychological perspective from a philosophical one. In this essay, we shall only ponder about film and film genres, and how we, as spectators or film critics, may interpret it.
Genre comes from the French word for ‘type’ or ‘kind’, which was initially used to categorize literary works or paintings, and is now widely used to classify films. The problem arises from the fact that no film of a particular genre can incorporate all the elements of that genre. In concomitant, no definition of genre is capable of defining all aspects of a film of a certain genre. (Langford 2005:Preface)
Genres are meant to be defining but not limiting a particular style or convention of all filmic elements. The building blocks of genre films are reflective of one another, thoroughly patronizing, and not original. (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Genre). However, there is no hard and fast rule to that concept. Genres are able to attract a specific target audience and so they exploit our portion of the brain that loves repetition or wants to feed itself with overtures of the same iconography or narrative. (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Genre). It is also surprising how the audience enjoy watching the kind and extent of violence that they would normally loathe in real life. (Altman 1996:279 in Langford 2005)
Torben Kragh Grodal has explored some of the important aspects of our thought processes which aid in our interpretation of films. He believes that “emotions are not irrational forces but necessary motivators for cognition and the possible resulting action”.(Grodal 1997) He describes how we interpret film genres from their narrative patterns, thus bringing about emotional effects in viewers. Signals from the screen travel via the visual cortex to the association areas and frontal areas, finally reaching the pre-motor areas of the brain. This process can be inhibited at any point or channeled in opposite directions to bring about a specific response in the viewer. According to his four-step model, it can be theorized that after the initial basic perception of image consisting of shapes, texture and figures, a memory matching occurs. The brain searches for visual cues that are stored in the memory as visual structures with affective values to be matched with the current image. A film which allows it to be represented/recognized in such a manner is termed as ‘lyrical’. The third step of this model involves “construction of diegesis”, which eventually leads to identification with the characters and/or context. This may produce different sorts of reactions, but Grodal stresses on three categories: voluntary telic (goal-oriented responses), paratelic responses (semi-voluntary ones that are repetitive and not goal-oriented), and autonomic responses (involuntary responses such as laughing, crying, shivering, or an increased heart beat rate). (Anderson 1998)
Cinematic images, like paintings, are ‘detached displays’ (i.e. they do not belong to the space and time the viewer resides in), but they differ in a way that in films, something or the other is happening, whereas in paintings there is no question of anything happening. This is because pictures or slides are static whereas films consist of moving pictures. However, this idea can easily be dismissed if we consider films of comic strips such as Oshima’s Band of Ninjas, or films of photos such as Godard & Gorin’s Letter to Jane and Michael Snow’s One Second in Montreal, or films made up of only sentences such as Michael Snow’s So Is This. Yet, the possibility and the expectation of movement in films will always be lurking in our minds, unless we are conditioned into repetitive viewing of static elements in films. Even then, stasis in films is always a stylistic choice rather than a necessity. It is aesthetically prescriptive in nature. On the other hand, describing paintings or slides as static is like stating the obvious. Carroll stresses that a more appropriate synonym for films is moving images rather than moving pictures, as the term image encompasses both pictures and abstractions. Then he goes on to locating the borderline between our perception of theatres in comparison with that of films by citing other theorists such as Roman Ingarden, elaborating on words versus spectacle as dominant factors in theatres and films respectively. He also engages in a fine brainstorming of the focus of performance in the two medium.(Carroll 1996) We may simplify our understanding of the matter as the difference between writing on a paper with pen and typing in a computer using a keyboard. The mental processes that differ in the two instances may be likened to the difference in perception of film narrative and literary narrative.
Richard Allen throws some light on fictional and non-fictional depictions being common in that both can be recognized by looking rather than by reading. To analyze depictions, it is important to recognize patterns without having to process imaginations of seeing the patterns. (Allen 1997). In her article on Cognitive Science and Film Theory, Cynthia Freeland ponders upon the debate of film as an illusion. She refers to two psychologists, Joseph Anderson and Ed S. Tan, who endorse the pro-illusion theory, as opposed to the philosophers Carroll and Currie who are contra. Anderson thinks of film as a set of illusive stimuli that can be run like a program in the viewer’s mind. (Freeland 1997). Contra-illusion theorists believe that the primitive subsystems of the brain cannot distinguish between an object seen and a depiction of the object seen. In such a theory, illusion is something that we can live with.(Currie 1995)
Film genres and sub-genres may be classified as the Western, the Musical, the War film, the Gangster movie, the horror film, the science-fiction film, Film Noir, the Documentary, the Holocaust film, Pornography, Transgenre and Metagenre films. But this is not a fully comprehensive list. When it comes to interpretation of films, Grodal’s typology of film genres is particularly helpful. This includes the canonical narrative, lyrical, obsession, melodrama, horror, schizoid, comical and the metafiction genre. The lyrical genre involves perceptual, nonlinear time, networks of associations, fusion of world and mind, intensities or saturations by proximal focus of attention, no telic enacting, possibly paratelic or autonomic 'motion'. Lyrical elements can be found in many film genres. The canonical narrative expression involves telic voluntary enacting (acting out), linear time, construction of objective world, cognitive and emphatic identification with subject, tension, distal focus of attention; the self is quite absorbed to the situation and the actions arise from intense, external desires or aversions. John Ford’s Stagecoach (1939) and Billy Wilder’s Double Indemnity (1944) are categorized as Western and Film Noir respectively but they can be both thought of having a canonical expression. Obsession involves paratelic/involuntary enacting, often progressive-regressive or non-linear time, some saturations and proximal focus of attention. Melodrama involves perceptual, causal enacting, autonomic reaction, construction of objective world, cognitive and empathic identification with 'object', fatalistic fusion of 'subject' with 'object', saturations and autonomic response combined with proximal focus of attention; one of two response is likely to occur - either positive (falling in love) or negative (tragedy). A lot of different kinds of films can have elements of melodrama in them. Early Neorealist films such as Roberto Rossellini’s Roma città aperta (Rome Open City, 1945) as well as many film noir movies have melodrama in them. Ritwik Ghatak’s Meghe Dhaka Tara(The Cloud-Capped Star, 1960), Komal Gandhar (E-Flat, 1961) and Jukti Takko Aar Gappo (Reason, Debate and a Story, 1974) have high melodramatic elements in them. Horror genre of films (e.g. Alfred Hitchcock’s Psycho (1960)) involve causal enacting, autonomic reaction, construction of subjective world, cognitive and emphatic identification with object, aversion between subject and object, tensions, saturations, or autonomic response, proximal focus of attention; the film experience derived from this genre consists of strong feelings of fright, hate, desire, heroic courage are enacted in a subjective world, experienced from the point of view of the victim. Schizoid films involve causal enacting, construction of subjective world, cognitive identification with object, fragmented space, intensities and saturations, proximal as well as distal focus of attention; the response is likely to be alienation, objectivation, the self is cued to take a 'voyeuristic' position. Comics involve causal and autonomic enacting, rejection of emphatic identification with object, rejection of objective world, autonomic response; the response is autonomic (parasympathetic) reception at a high level of arousal, based on a redefinition of the reality-status of the arousing phenomenon, and we laugh at the failures of the protagonists. Billy Wilder’s Some Like it Hot (1959) is clearly a comic. Some comedies of Chaplin are also capable of making us cry and laugh at different point. The metafiction genre involves mediated identification with subjects and objects via cognitive and emphatic 'frames' (personae, all types of schemata), several focuses of attention; the response is mastering, learning, true ideals, self development
strategies for avoiding conflict
idealized self images. (http://www.olavegeland.com/epm37.htm). Many of Satyajit Ray’s films such as Pather Panchali (Song of the Little Road, 1955), Aparajito (The Unvanquished, 1956) and Apur Sansar (The World of Apu, 1959) are metagenre films according to Grodal’s typology, but are otherwise known to be feature films.
All said and done, it is important to appreciate film as a language, with the shots as words, the mise-en-scene as letters of the word, with editing and cuts resembling conjunctions and punctuations. The language of cinema is that of the camera mostly. In such contexts, it would be incomplete not to mention montage: Eisenstein noticed that if different shots, each meaningful on its own, can be joined together, a structured filmic sentence would emerge. If a shot doesn’t have a distinctive meaning of its own, it can be joined to another similar shot or a one completely opposite in meaning to the former one, to make a sentence out of a film. This technique of making meaningful shots directs the feelings and moods of the viewers, and undoubtedly serves to convey what the director actually prescribed.(Ray 1982) Again, we may please to think of the gaps between each paragraph in an essay as a montage. A montage may sometimes act as a brain-breather, especially following scenes which are quite intense. Paragraphs in an essay allow us to tread upon different seemingly unrelated aspects of the same topic or argument. Our mental processes are such that the moment we finish reading one paragraph and move on to the next, our preconceived notions prepare our mind to read a totally opposite, new and/or an elaborated form of the former paragraph. The same aim can be achieved for shots in a film joined together in a montage.
How we perceive film genres may vary between cultures and different regions. But as long as we have film as a language of its own, film makers and film critics will follow a certain grammar to interpret film. According to Ray, Westerns have a more ballad-like quality which is missing in Gangster films, which have harshness and less well-defined qualities. He also likens the twirl of lethal weapon around a finger to a trill or turn in Mozart or Haydn. (Ray 1976). André Bazin speaks of the lyricism in Westerns that the landscape and other iconographic elements have to offer. (Bazin 1956). Interpretation of film by mass viewers may vary substantially between people of the same culture/religion, let alone people of different regional or cultural origin. In 21st Century, the concept of genre is getting more and more complex and we are offered with films that have elements of different genres put together.
REFERENCES
Genre. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Genre
Film experience as a prototype for Self Experience http://www.olavegeland.com/epm37.htm
Allen, R. (1997). Looking at Motion Pictures. Film Theory and Philosophy. R. A. a. M. Smith. Oxford, Oxford University Press: 88-89.
Anderson, B. (1998). "Review: [Untitled]." Film Quarterly 52(Autumun No. 1): 87-88. http://www.jstor.org/cgi-bin/jstor/printpage/00151386/ap040145/04a00520/0.pdf?backcontext=page&dowhat=Acrobat&config=jstor&userID=96cb72ba@anu.edu.au/01cc99331600501c5cccf&0.pdf
Bazin, A. (1956). "Beauty of a Western." Cahiers du cinema 55(January).
Carroll, N. (1996). Theorizing Moving Image. New York, Cambridge University Press.
Currie, G. (1995). Image and Mind. New York, Cambridge University Press.
Freeland, C. (1997). Cognitive Science and Film Theory. Santa Fe, American Society for Aesthetics. 2007. http://www.class.uh.edu/cogsci/CogSciFilmTheory.html
Grodal, T. (1997). Moving Pictures. New York, Oxford University Press.
Langford, B. (2005). Film Genre. Edinburgh, Edinburgh University Press Limited.
Ray, S. (1976). Our Films, Their Films. Calcutta, Orient Longman Limited.
Ray, S. (1982). Speaking of Films. New Delhi, Penguin Books India.


Tuesday, March 27, 2007
7:06:34 PM
Why don’t you try all these in Calcutta??? Yes, why not??? Come on, you are the government...come out and rape as many women and children you like…come on, I can see your balls under your white dhoti…unleash all your desires. Just knock at every door. Citizens will be pleased to offer you Rasna and you can relax, cool down your scrotum to just the right temperature and start raping women and the children…you can start with your own daughter as a symbol of incest…
If you think you can’t handle all the voluptuous women all by yourself, employ your followers…give them a chance…they will be more than happy to bask in perverse pleasure…the city waits for you Mr. CM. It wants to be fucked…
You don’t need Tata cars to secretly spend your desires…there’s no need to do all that behind the black glasses of your car…The city needs no Book Fair, it just wants to be fucked…by you…
The whole city has become a brothel…the journalists, the protesters, the young and the rebellious…they all want to be fucked by you, Buddha…just once…see what happens…this whole state is a big brothel, Mr. CM…enjoy it…exploit it…give it an orgasm…just be careful of what you may find on the other side of the orgasm…

Lola rennt is just another example of success in film-making, which results from the script-writer, director and the music director being the same person. That’s right, Tom Tykwer. Although this movie has ample elements of fantasy and fairy-tale twists, it basically dwells in the realm of metaphysical questions of our existence and fate, and thus, also to see if we can change our fate or not.
The scenes revolve in this trivial set of events that lead to the final result, as Lola runs to accomplish her mission in 20min. Here, the distance between her boyfriend Manni and the 100,000marks is only an excuse that triggers Lola to traverse through a set of seemingly unimportant events, which evidently take shape as defining factors, as Lola plunges into these same chain-of-events for the first, second and third time.
Like a theoretical physicist, Tykwer explores three possibilities of an uncertain future to any given, existing problem of Life. Here, the problem being as ultimate as Death. In a way, he also brings Death closer to show how Life is interconnected to Death only by a set of events. Through Lola’s running, he seems to shorten the span of time connecting Life and the inevitability of Death. Tykwer seems to stress on that in the first of the 3 possibilities, by giving clippings of what (death) will happen to the woman who simply passes by at Lola's father's office.
Surprisingly, the only factor that doesn’t seem to change is Lola’s mother, who keeps on being a telephonic philanderer with astrological obsessions, all throughout the three possibilities. Perhaps, her mentioning of the zodiac sign Sagittarius has something to do with running after any goal/challenge at hand. Tykwer probably wants to catch the film observer’s attention by implying that you can either go about your desired goal blindly, or knowingly, in which case you are more likely to succeed. In the three episodic possibilities, the protagonist (Lola) seems to get more and more conscious of trivial events as deciding factors. Her consciousness reaches an almost supernatural, semi-god height, each time she traverses the same path. This is noted by her ability to break glasses by screaming; each time, her power to do that increases. Her ability to scream and break glasses seems linearly proportional to her being able to control the situation.
As Lola transits from the first to the second chance, and from the second to the third, the events around her take the shape of a space-time warp, that gets more and more spiral, thus setting her free from the circle that seems to somehow bind her to her fate. Visual references to that are seen in the restaurant sign through the glass of the phone booth Manni called from, and also as the receiver and chord went spiraling as Lola keeps her receiver to start running.
There’s also a bit of off-the-hook soul-searching that goes on after Lola dies and after Manni dies, igniting honest and insightful questions in our mind about human relationships. These scenes, just like the tripartite movie itself, tell of other possibilities that are considered in human relationships. The element of uncertainty seems to be recurring.
Another factor that is defined from the very beginning is Lola’s father. That he is not going to help her is fixed, unchangeable. So is the cursing of the woman with the baby: she curses Lola all the three times even though Lola consciously keeps herself from falling onto her the third time.
All the other characters seem to be oblivious of Lola’s journey in the three possibilities, except for the guard at her father’s bank, who greets her as “princess Lola” and seems to almost know that she can make it, in this life or the next.
During the first episode of Lola running, Tykwer probably takes few conscious shots of camera moving in the opposite direction to her running, giving us visual clues of her not succeeding. Likewise, there are plenty of changes that occur in the last episode, especially that of the bicyclist finding the ragged-old man with Manni’s bag of money, and to satisfy it all, Manni getting back his bag from him, may account for Lola starting to believe in omens, and in signs that tell her of the possible outcome. This can be accounted for in the background oriental music in the film as well.
Strangely, we also see that Manni behaved as if nothing happened after Lola came on time with the sum of money after exhausting so much of her determination and will. To have done all that, and gaining new awareness into what keeps time and space ticking, not get as much as an acknowledgement from Manni, sets her wondering quizzically about rhymes and reasons. And there it all ends, as the camera freezes and cuts of in a close-shot of Manni, as Lola doesnt disclose the contents of her bag.
I wanted to start this writing with "It makes me feel dizzy looking at the so-called 'comprehensive' facts and figures of Mr. Absolutist...", and also exhibit my ability to use phrases with double meanings by saying "...I still can't convince myself to be a 'blind ally' of the Left Front govt. from the lucrative, confident numbers provided by this same Mr. Absolutist" with the 'e' constantly trying to pop in and out of l and y of ally...so on and so forth...but I WILL NOT! I will not do that cos I can't sit back in front of the monitor and enjoy this steaming argument, for I now know exactly what's happening in Singur...It's people's lives that are in question here...Not some debate between a certain Mr. Absolutist and the good number of anonymous individuals patronizing my previous post! And moreover, it's pointless to argue with the kind of morons who are born and brought up in Bengal and claim that they can't understand Bengali in Roman script...whereas these morons claim to understand the underlying genius of the works and life of Satyajit Ray...obviously failing to grasp the detective genius of Feluda or Shanku...but never mind...
I have got first-hand information of what's happening in Singur:
1. Farmers are now pauperized and hence they have no fear in cursing the CM with the worst slangs possible.
2. The farmers themselves informed that the CPM govt. have actually grabbed 1400-1500 acres of land, contrary to their claim of the dwindling 997 acres.
3. CPI(M) is terrorizing the farmers in Singur, going as far as to cut off electricity connections of houses of farmers, who are rebelling.
(The above info is taken from Singur itself on 22nd Dec 2006)
My salutes to the youth who risked their lives in making it to Singur to get to know the actual facts the govt. is trying to hide...My heartfelt congratulations to those who returned alive after dodging the police and the RAF, who were hunting them, lest these youngsters get to know the actual truth. With the true spirit of Mahatma Gandhi, they were not armed, contrary to the popular belief Mr. Absolutist holds and tries to propagate...My advice to my comrades: please carry lighters cos they can help you from the irritation of tear gas. Do not use water, since that will irritate your eyes further...light a matchstick and hold it in front of your eyes...
Forget the lucrative facts and figures...what does your common sense tell you? How the hell is it possible for the govt. to ensure permanent employment to these farmers when the state itself suffers from a high unemployment rate at this very instant? Just, how???
If there had been "elaborate consultations with the local population" truly made, why would the police have to torture innocent men and women of Singur? Please...if these are wild stories, then the story of 40 women and innumerable labourers in "extensive community development projects" is a wilder fiction and extremely alarming.
The CPI(M) double standards are all the more emphasized when the CM gave a speech asking people to go to Singur and find out what kind of 'development' is under construction there...now, we all know there's a bloody 144 out there...how will people go and find out???
Why were the journalists beaten up if the govt. is so clean?
Medha Patkar wasnt armed...If she is considered an outsider, then what was Brinda Karat outside Kolkata?And both Kolkata and Singur are in West Bengal; Delhi and Kolkata are places of the same country...then where does the word "outsider" come from??? Should we say that Netaji shouldn't have lead the people of his country outside
And of course this is my battle too, if CPI(M) prides itself in rallying against the execution of Saddam...
The true picture is overwhelmingly fascinating...From the very beginning of his term, the CM engaged the state into building housings in the suburbs of Kolkata...and they are mighty cheap and affordable, we all know...The idea was to attract the 'middle class' people to the suburbs thereby creating a market for cars. The
The CPI(M) govt. knew all along that they had to grab the lands of Singur, by hook or by crook, sooner or later. In this way, a whole new generation of middle class citizens will be gradually wiped out from the state...they will get richer by the day, whilst the poor will only get poorer and poorer...some of the poor, landless, paupers will die...what a way to replenish poverty with death! The CPI(M)'s idea of "development" is such an unfailing "feel-good" factor...How good-humored of CU to award D.Lit. to Jyoti Basu at such a time, for "standing beside ordinary, root-level people"!
In Singur on 18th Dec'2006, a 17 year old local girl, Taposhi Malik, was gang-raped by the police and the people of CPM, and was burnt alive! What do YOU say to that? Get YOUR facts straight...it's unfortunate that one should never get to know these facts since they are blind supporters of CPI(M)...The responsibility of the state govt. police didn't end there: they forced the father of the dead girl to sign a forged note, which said that the girl committed suicide,but the poor man refused to do so...The dead body was then taken for Post Mortem but the Human Rights Commission wasn't allowed to witness it...ora aro boro 'bohiragoto' kina...All hail to the Left Front Communism and its democracy!!!
News channels like Star Ananda and Chobbish Ghanta are busy broadcasting news that Taposhi Malik committed suicide. Why are they doing this is beyond my comprehension...Are they simply trying to back CPI(M) or are themselves terrorized by the fact that the journalists are being beaten up nowadays?
Who's doing violence? The ultra-Leftists or the govt. Leftists? The govt. Leftists are more powerful in that they can exploit armed forces as and when they feel like, but these ultra-leftists can't...If Trinamool Congress hurled bombs in Singur, they could have kept doing the same...why did they choose to fast then? I personally am doubtful of the ideals and actions of TMC...but I believe that they can spare to stay away from this issue to truly save the people of Singur...That way, the CPI(M) can no longer cover this whole issue as TMC's mindless opposition-for-the-sake-of-opposition against them! The veil can then be lifted from people's eyes that this is a struggle for the survival and existence of the people of Singur, not some political humdrum between CPM and TMC.
TMC can probably care to protest against land-grabbing in
................................
To Mr. Moron Rising:
Yes, I did write this...this is polite way of saying "Think before you speak (or kick!)"...you can't obviously prove me wrong I'm sure and we seriously have no room for debate, cos I am dealing with facts, and you, fiction...just a word of advice: DO NOT ADVISE!